The Literacy Narrative
More subversively, Maroney’s Narrative suggests that the prison’s ban on writing and on correspondence catalyzes his literacy efforts. “As in the latter Prison no paper was allowed,” Maroney writes, “I could not make notes or memorandums of my thoughts and feelings, let alone the keeping of a journal of my experience” (32). Strictly speaking, Maroney did not write poetry while in prison: he generated verse and committed lines and experiences to memory because he needed a way around Auburn’s prohibitions against writing, and needed a way to record his thoughts and feelings. Thus, while the sentiment of the poetry is mostly conventional, his foray into verse (and later, memoir) must also be recognized as a strategic resistance to Auburn’s writing ban.
Thus, the text challenges us not to rest on a too-simple contrast between “hidden” literacy and “public” literacy. In Maroney’s Meditations, clandestine literacy practices mobilize the inmate’s public voice as prison reformist as well as his poetic efforts as exemplary convert. Hidden copies of former inmate William Coffey’s Inside Out and smuggled newspapers are not “opposed” to the public voice of authority that Maroney seeks to claim: they authorize this voice, serve as evidence for his claims, and even inspire his acts of writing. Prohibitions against writing prompt Maroney to commit experiences to verse in order to recollect them later, and to publicize these experiences and poems in his public Narrative. Disallowed behind bars, Maroney’s literacy, both orthodox and clandestine, gives him explanatory power over the trials, monotony, pain, and struggles of his life, and a path to transform his own shame into a fantasy of public citizenship.